Psychologist Jonathan Haidt studies morality and emotion in the context of culture. He asks: Why did humans evolve to have morals — and why did we all evolve to have such different morals, to the point that our moral differences may make us deadly enemies? It’s a question with deep repercussions in war and peace — and in modern politics, where reasoned discourse has been replaced by partisan anger and cries of “You just don’t get it!”
Haidt asks, “Can’t we all disagree more constructively?” He suggests we might build a more civil and productive discourse by understanding the moral psychology of those we disagree with, and committing to a more civil political process. He’s also active in the study of positive psychology and human flourishing.
Learn more about his drive for a more productive and civil politics — and sign a pledge to engage in civil politics — on his website CivilPolitics.org. And take an eye-opening quiz about your own morals at YourMorals.org.
Pages
- The Journeyman
- Arrythmic Verses
- Articles
- Ted Favorites
- Barry Schwartz on the Paradox of Choice
- Jane Goodall on what separates us from the apes
- Jonathan Haidt studies morality and emotion in the context of culture.
- Matthieu Ricard on the Habits of Happiness
- Paul Zak: Trust, morality and oxytocin
- Philip Zimbardo on Our Time Calibration
- Robert Sapolsky: The uniqueness of humans
- Tony Robbins asks Why We Do What We Do
- Karen Armstrong on Compassion
- Dan Gilbert asks, Why are we happy?
- Sir Ken Robinson on Creativity
- Philip Zimbardo shows how people become monsters … or heroes
- David Bolinsky animates a cell
- About
Categories
Archives